Size and weight of vehicles Play Major Role in Crash Safety
Friday, Apr 17,2009, 8:55:44 PM Click:
Recent tests confirm that the official size and weight influence the likelihood of injury in all types of automobile accidents, and the results of tests in May using insurance risk management. Three face-to-face crash tests of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, each involving a mini Microcar or average size in a model of the same manufacturer, to show how extra vehicle size and weight to strengthen the protection of occupants in a collision.
The tests focus on the physics of car accidents, which implies that small cars can not protect people in crashes and the larger, heavier models. In a collision between two vehicles that differ in size and weight, people in smaller, lighter vehicle will be a disadvantage. The larger, heavier vehicle, press the smaller, lighter one hour back at impact. This means there will be less force on the occupants of the heavy vehicle and most people in the vehicle lighter. Greater strength is more likely, so the risk of injury goes back to the smaller, lighter vehicle.
"There are good reasons to buy mini people," said Adrian Lund, president of the Institute. "They are more affordable, and they use less gas. But security compromises are evident from our new tests. From Similarly, the implications are clear when it comes to fuel economy. If the car to reduce their fleets to use less fuel, occupant safety will be compromised. But there are ways to better serve fuel economy and safety
Although the physics of car frontal crashes are generally described in terms of what happens to vehicles, injuries are the forces acting on the occupants, and these forces are affected by two main factors. One is the weight of a vehicle crash, which determines how many will change their speed at impact. The biggest change, the more forces on the people inside and the greater the risk of injury. The second factor is the size of the car, especially the distance between the front of a vehicle's passenger compartment. The more, the lower forces on the occupants.
"Although much safer than they were several years ago as a small group to do a comparatively poor job protecting people in crashes simply because they are small and light," says Lund. "In collisions with larger vehicles, the forces acting on the smaller are the highest, and there is less distance in front of a small car in the cockpit of" descent "of the impact. These and other factors, increase the likelihood of injury. "
The tests focus on the physics of car accidents, which implies that small cars can not protect people in crashes and the larger, heavier models. In a collision between two vehicles that differ in size and weight, people in smaller, lighter vehicle will be a disadvantage. The larger, heavier vehicle, press the smaller, lighter one hour back at impact. This means there will be less force on the occupants of the heavy vehicle and most people in the vehicle lighter. Greater strength is more likely, so the risk of injury goes back to the smaller, lighter vehicle.
"There are good reasons to buy mini people," said Adrian Lund, president of the Institute. "They are more affordable, and they use less gas. But security compromises are evident from our new tests. From Similarly, the implications are clear when it comes to fuel economy. If the car to reduce their fleets to use less fuel, occupant safety will be compromised. But there are ways to better serve fuel economy and safety
Although the physics of car frontal crashes are generally described in terms of what happens to vehicles, injuries are the forces acting on the occupants, and these forces are affected by two main factors. One is the weight of a vehicle crash, which determines how many will change their speed at impact. The biggest change, the more forces on the people inside and the greater the risk of injury. The second factor is the size of the car, especially the distance between the front of a vehicle's passenger compartment. The more, the lower forces on the occupants.
"Although much safer than they were several years ago as a small group to do a comparatively poor job protecting people in crashes simply because they are small and light," says Lund. "In collisions with larger vehicles, the forces acting on the smaller are the highest, and there is less distance in front of a small car in the cockpit of" descent "of the impact. These and other factors, increase the likelihood of injury. "
You may also be interested in:
- Moore-Paulsen Amendment Provides Clarity to CFPA Legislation
- With $78 Million Stock Buy, Hedge Fund Paulson to Own Nearly 10% of Conseco
- ASPPA opposed Connecticut 401 (k) Legislation
- Majority of U.S. Adults Worried about Cost of Medical Care a
- Sri Lanka's state non-tax income up 26.3% in Q1: Official data
Featured
SC bill extends health coverage to adult children
Copyright: The Associated Press. All rights reserved. May This material may not
AP INTERVIEW: Sebelius says insurers won't succeed
WASHINGTON_The insurance lobby won't be able to block a public health plan
Correction: Fitch Affirms Manulife Financial Corp's
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- (This is an amended version a release issued earlier
21st Century's Turbulent Year
In what analysts are calling another blow to the local economy and to a company
MetLife Executive to Speak at Wachovia Conference
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Anthony J. Nugent, executive vice president,
About NAIC Insurers pursuit of its own rating agency
Copyright: A.M. Best Company, Inc. Source: BestWire Services Wordcount: Some
Name Pencom defaulting employers
by Sylvester Enoghase Mar 24, 2009 (Daily Independent / All Africa Global Media
MOST POPULAR
- Most Read
- Most Discussed
- Most Emailed
- Class-action Suit Filed Against Nationwide Insurance
- Fiesta Insurance Plans 18 New Stores after Sales Growth
- Hartford Lawsuit Accuses Arch of Poaching Employees, Business
- Couple Charged With $38 Million Workers' Compensation Insura
- Florida Regulators Cite Liberty National Life Insurance In B
- BestWeek: Combined Ratio for P/C Writers Tips 100 Mark in Fi
- Allstate Asks N.J. for 15.4% Average Auto Rate Increase
- ‘Cash for Clunkers’ Requires Year of Continuous Auto Insurance Coverage on Trade-In
- Towers Perrin, Watson Wyatt Merger Could Shake Up Employee Benefits Industry
- Judge Upholds $13.1 Million Verdict in Lincoln Annuity Patent Case
-
Annuity Ladders -
AIG Got 73 employees at least $ 1 million, Cuomo Says -
Hardest hit by the economy, Americans risk Knockout Without -
Six in ten say Turn off family medical care because of costs -
Aon Benfield CEO: Economic Turmoil should be good for reinsu -
Market Barometer - April 2009 -
More Sue Willis Holdings Over Alleged Role in Bank Fraud Another group of Venezuelan investor clients of Stanford Financial Group are suing Willis Group Holdings Ltd., alleging the broker was a "w -
AIG confirms the loss of Directors at the Bank AIG


Discuss this news
Click Here to see all comments