Raising Taxes At Center Of Health Care Reform Debate
Tuesday, Jul 14,2009, 10:39:31 AM Click:
Republicans and Democrats have continued to compete Sunday on how to pay for health care reform.
Some Democrats rejected a proposal to start taxing health care benefits provided by employers. At the same time, the dynamics among Democrats appears to be building Obama's proposal to limit tax deductions for those earning over $ 250,000 per year.
Republicans oppose the high cost of health care reform, as well as key elements of proposals, including democratic higher taxes on the wealthiest. However, some Republicans have expressed their support for the taxation of benefits provided by the employer of the most expensive health insurance.
Some Democrats rejected a proposal to start taxing health care benefits provided by employers. At the same time, the dynamics among Democrats appears to be building Obama's proposal to limit tax deductions for those earning over $ 250,000 per year.
Republicans oppose the high cost of health care reform, as well as key elements of proposals, including democratic higher taxes on the wealthiest. However, some Republicans have expressed their support for the taxation of benefits provided by the employer of the most expensive health insurance.
The bottom line: Little is clear as the White House and Democrats continue to press for a health care reform bill by the end of the year.
Last week, negotiations on House legislation hit a snag when fiscally conservative Democrats nicknamed "Blue Dogs" pressed the Democratic leadership for big changes to the draft bill, which includes a government-run health care plan to compete with private insurers.
Democratic leaders worked over the past couple of weeks to finalize details of legislation for a Friday rollout. But the Blue Dog Coalition sent a letter late Thursday night saying the bill "lacks a number of elements essential to preserving what works and fixing what is broken."
Meanwhile, a new analysis from Congress indicates that a health care reform bill being worked up by Senate Democrats -- which includes a public insurance plan and requires employers to cover workers -- would cost $611 billion over 10 years, far less than previous estimates.
The figure is hundreds of billions of dollars less than two estimates in June by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, including one that calculated the cost of a less-comprehensive program at $1.6 trillion over the same period.
In coming weeks, Senate Democrats will have to decide whether they will try to force through their plan or continue to negotiate with Republicans for a bill that would likely be less expensive and contain a much smaller role for government in the health care system.
Supporters of a government-run insurance program, including the president, have argued it would keep down costs.
Obama said in a July 2 White House statement that the latest health committee proposal "reflects many of the principles I've laid out."
"The public option would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices and keeping the insurance companies honest," he said. "The legislation also improves the quality of patient care, improves safety for patients and strengthens the commitment to preventive health care: preventing people from getting sick in the first place."
Recent surveys show some support for a public option.
A CNN-Opinion Research Corp. survey released July 1 found 51 percent support Obama's health care plan, but most worry that their costs would go up, and only one in five think their families would be better off.
Other polls showed opposition to taxing health benefits provided by employers.
A recent New York Times/CBS News poll showed only 20 percent of respondents support a possible new tax on employer-provided health care benefits, and a Washington Post/ABC News poll found 70 percent opposed it. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found 54 percent of respondents oppose the new tax.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that Obama opposes taxing health benefits, but stopped short of calling it a deal-breaker for the president.
Instead, she advocated Obama's proposal to cap tax exemptions for the wealthy -- those earning more than $250,000 a year -- to the levels under Republican President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s.
The proposal would raise an estimated $330 billion, Sebelius said, which would cover most of the health care reform costs not met by reduced spending on existing programs.
"The bottom line is, it's got to be paid for, and we all have a shared responsibility that we all need to play a role," Sebelius said.
On the same program, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee took the opposite stance, rejecting higher income taxes for the wealthy but calling for a new tax on the benefits of the most expensive employer-provided health insurance plans.
He and other Republicans support a plan that would give Americans cash -- initial figures suggest $5,000-$7,000 a year -- to buy their own private health insurance instead of creating a government-funded public option favored by Obama.
Last week, negotiations on House legislation hit a snag when fiscally conservative Democrats nicknamed "Blue Dogs" pressed the Democratic leadership for big changes to the draft bill, which includes a government-run health care plan to compete with private insurers.
Democratic leaders worked over the past couple of weeks to finalize details of legislation for a Friday rollout. But the Blue Dog Coalition sent a letter late Thursday night saying the bill "lacks a number of elements essential to preserving what works and fixing what is broken."
Meanwhile, a new analysis from Congress indicates that a health care reform bill being worked up by Senate Democrats -- which includes a public insurance plan and requires employers to cover workers -- would cost $611 billion over 10 years, far less than previous estimates.
The figure is hundreds of billions of dollars less than two estimates in June by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, including one that calculated the cost of a less-comprehensive program at $1.6 trillion over the same period.
In coming weeks, Senate Democrats will have to decide whether they will try to force through their plan or continue to negotiate with Republicans for a bill that would likely be less expensive and contain a much smaller role for government in the health care system.
Supporters of a government-run insurance program, including the president, have argued it would keep down costs.
Obama said in a July 2 White House statement that the latest health committee proposal "reflects many of the principles I've laid out."
"The public option would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices and keeping the insurance companies honest," he said. "The legislation also improves the quality of patient care, improves safety for patients and strengthens the commitment to preventive health care: preventing people from getting sick in the first place."
Recent surveys show some support for a public option.
A CNN-Opinion Research Corp. survey released July 1 found 51 percent support Obama's health care plan, but most worry that their costs would go up, and only one in five think their families would be better off.
Other polls showed opposition to taxing health benefits provided by employers.
A recent New York Times/CBS News poll showed only 20 percent of respondents support a possible new tax on employer-provided health care benefits, and a Washington Post/ABC News poll found 70 percent opposed it. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found 54 percent of respondents oppose the new tax.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that Obama opposes taxing health benefits, but stopped short of calling it a deal-breaker for the president.
Instead, she advocated Obama's proposal to cap tax exemptions for the wealthy -- those earning more than $250,000 a year -- to the levels under Republican President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s.
The proposal would raise an estimated $330 billion, Sebelius said, which would cover most of the health care reform costs not met by reduced spending on existing programs.
"The bottom line is, it's got to be paid for, and we all have a shared responsibility that we all need to play a role," Sebelius said.
On the same program, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee took the opposite stance, rejecting higher income taxes for the wealthy but calling for a new tax on the benefits of the most expensive employer-provided health insurance plans.
He and other Republicans support a plan that would give Americans cash -- initial figures suggest $5,000-$7,000 a year -- to buy their own private health insurance instead of creating a government-funded public option favored by Obama.
"If we have a Cadillac insurance and your employer gives you, then some of it will be imposed," said Alexander, with the help of new revenue to "give everyone a chance to buy their own health care insurance. "
Republicans also argue that the limitation on income tax exemptions for wealthy Americans harm small business owners, many of which are in tax brackets rich as they claim their business income on tax returns personal.
A spokesman for Majority Leader Harry Reid in the Senate, which met with Republicans on July 8, said the Nevada Democrat believes it is time for the opposition senators to decide if the intention to participate in the drafting of a bill, or simply opposed to any real reform.
Republicans also argue that the limitation on income tax exemptions for wealthy Americans harm small business owners, many of which are in tax brackets rich as they claim their business income on tax returns personal.
A spokesman for Majority Leader Harry Reid in the Senate, which met with Republicans on July 8, said the Nevada Democrat believes it is time for the opposition senators to decide if the intention to participate in the drafting of a bill, or simply opposed to any real reform.
You may also be interested in:
- ASPPA applauds Obama's proposals for strengthening the priva
- Baseball-Size Hail in Texas Batters Insurers for More Than $150 Million
- INDIA GOVT WANTS TO STRENGTHEN HIGH-LEVEL FIN. SECTOR COMMITTEE
- Shanghai Benchmark Stock Index Hit 5-month High
- CHINA'S PREMIUM INCOME RISES 8% IN FIRST THREE QUARTERS
Featured
Colo. House panel approves takeover of insurer
Copyright: The Associated Press. All rights reserved. May This material may not
Assured Guaranty Ltd annonce l'exercice des options de
HAMILTON, Bermuda--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Assured Guaranty Ltd. (Assured)
Argo Pro Announces Argo PROtect for Technology
CHICAGO - (Business Wire) Argo Pro, a division of Argo Group International
MaybachFinancial.com Posts Free Analyst Report on ETN,
LONDON -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 04/23/09 -- MaybachFinancial.com is one of the
Fitch Expects to Rate ACE INA Holdings' $500MM Sr.
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Fitch Ratings expects to assign an 'A' rating to the
CNinsure Appoints Zhao to Head Insurance Brokerage
CNinsure, the Nasdaq-listed independent Chinese insurance intermediary, has
Citizens Business Bank signs agreement with FDIC to
Bank holding company CVB Financial Corp (NASDAQ:CVBF) disclosed late Friday
MOST POPULAR
- Most Read
- Most Discussed
- Most Emailed
- average monthly cost for health insurance
- Aetna CEO Ronald A. Williams' 2008 Pay Package: $3.14 Millio
- House Democrats Say CBO Projects $500 Billion in Gross Savings From Medicare
- UnitedHealth, Aetna Win TRICARE contracts, Replacement Humana, Health Net
- Getting Older, but working longer: the average age at retire
- Tap Retirement Funds Penalty-Free Age Can Play A Role IRA
- Extension of TRICARE Health Insurance Coverage Included
- "Usual and Customary" Rates in the Health Insurance Industry
- Health Plans awaiting verdict in 2010 Medicare Advantage Cut
- President Obama to Hold Health Insurance Reform Rally in College Park, MD
-
Fannie, Freddie Overseer Defends Big Bonus -
CIGNA & CMC Life Enters China's Health Insurance Market -
Investment Fund Files Suit MBIA restructuring Unwind -
Health Care Reform Bill Expected This Summer; White House Se -
Milliman Analysis: Preparing for Mental Health Parity -
"Usual and Customary" Rates in the Health Insurance Industry -
Hallmark Financial Services Files Preliminary Proxy to elect -
Bipartisan health care bill must include GOP proposals


Discuss this news
Click Here to see all comments