Submitted by 07/14/09 , Click: , Source: insurance news net
Republicans and Democrats have continued to compete Sunday on how to pay for health care reform.
Some Democrats rejected a proposal to start taxing health care benefits provided by employers. At the same time, the dynamics among Democrats appears to be building Obama's proposal to limit tax deductions for those earning over $ 250,000 per year.
Republicans oppose the high cost of health care reform, as well as key elements of proposals, including democratic higher taxes on the wealthiest. However, some Republicans have expressed their support for the taxation of benefits provided by the employer of the most expensive health insurance.
Some Democrats rejected a proposal to start taxing health care benefits provided by employers. At the same time, the dynamics among Democrats appears to be building Obama's proposal to limit tax deductions for those earning over $ 250,000 per year.
Republicans oppose the high cost of health care reform, as well as key elements of proposals, including democratic higher taxes on the wealthiest. However, some Republicans have expressed their support for the taxation of benefits provided by the employer of the most expensive health insurance.
The bottom line: Little is clear as the White House and Democrats continue to press for a health care reform bill by the end of the year.
Last week, negotiations on House legislation hit a snag when fiscally conservative Democrats nicknamed "Blue Dogs" pressed the Democratic leadership for big changes to the draft bill, which includes a government-run health care plan to compete with private insurers.
Democratic leaders worked over the past couple of weeks to finalize details of legislation for a Friday rollout. But the Blue Dog Coalition sent a letter late Thursday night saying the bill "lacks a number of elements essential to preserving what works and fixing what is broken."
Meanwhile, a new analysis from Congress indicates that a health care reform bill being worked up by Senate Democrats -- which includes a public insurance plan and requires employers to cover workers -- would cost $611 billion over 10 years, far less than previous estimates.
The figure is hundreds of billions of dollars less than two estimates in June by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, including one that calculated the cost of a less-comprehensive program at $1.6 trillion over the same period.
In coming weeks, Senate Democrats will have to decide whether they will try to force through their plan or continue to negotiate with Republicans for a bill that would likely be less expensive and contain a much smaller role for government in the health care system.
Supporters of a government-run insurance program, including the president, have argued it would keep down costs.
Obama said in a July 2 White House statement that the latest health committee proposal "reflects many of the principles I've laid out."
"The public option would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices and keeping the insurance companies honest," he said. "The legislation also improves the quality of patient care, improves safety for patients and strengthens the commitment to preventive health care: preventing people from getting sick in the first place."
Recent surveys show some support for a public option.
A CNN-Opinion Research Corp. survey released July 1 found 51 percent support Obama's health care plan, but most worry that their costs would go up, and only one in five think their families would be better off.
Other polls showed opposition to taxing health benefits provided by employers.
A recent New York Times/CBS News poll showed only 20 percent of respondents support a possible new tax on employer-provided health care benefits, and a Washington Post/ABC News poll found 70 percent opposed it. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found 54 percent of respondents oppose the new tax.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that Obama opposes taxing health benefits, but stopped short of calling it a deal-breaker for the president.
Instead, she advocated Obama's proposal to cap tax exemptions for the wealthy -- those earning more than $250,000 a year -- to the levels under Republican President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s.
The proposal would raise an estimated $330 billion, Sebelius said, which would cover most of the health care reform costs not met by reduced spending on existing programs.
"The bottom line is, it's got to be paid for, and we all have a shared responsibility that we all need to play a role," Sebelius said.
On the same program, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee took the opposite stance, rejecting higher income taxes for the wealthy but calling for a new tax on the benefits of the most expensive employer-provided health insurance plans.
He and other Republicans support a plan that would give Americans cash -- initial figures suggest $5,000-$7,000 a year -- to buy their own private health insurance instead of creating a government-funded public option favored by Obama.
Last week, negotiations on House legislation hit a snag when fiscally conservative Democrats nicknamed "Blue Dogs" pressed the Democratic leadership for big changes to the draft bill, which includes a government-run health care plan to compete with private insurers.
Democratic leaders worked over the past couple of weeks to finalize details of legislation for a Friday rollout. But the Blue Dog Coalition sent a letter late Thursday night saying the bill "lacks a number of elements essential to preserving what works and fixing what is broken."
Meanwhile, a new analysis from Congress indicates that a health care reform bill being worked up by Senate Democrats -- which includes a public insurance plan and requires employers to cover workers -- would cost $611 billion over 10 years, far less than previous estimates.
The figure is hundreds of billions of dollars less than two estimates in June by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, including one that calculated the cost of a less-comprehensive program at $1.6 trillion over the same period.
In coming weeks, Senate Democrats will have to decide whether they will try to force through their plan or continue to negotiate with Republicans for a bill that would likely be less expensive and contain a much smaller role for government in the health care system.
Supporters of a government-run insurance program, including the president, have argued it would keep down costs.
Obama said in a July 2 White House statement that the latest health committee proposal "reflects many of the principles I've laid out."
"The public option would make health care affordable by increasing competition, providing more choices and keeping the insurance companies honest," he said. "The legislation also improves the quality of patient care, improves safety for patients and strengthens the commitment to preventive health care: preventing people from getting sick in the first place."
Recent surveys show some support for a public option.
A CNN-Opinion Research Corp. survey released July 1 found 51 percent support Obama's health care plan, but most worry that their costs would go up, and only one in five think their families would be better off.
Other polls showed opposition to taxing health benefits provided by employers.
A recent New York Times/CBS News poll showed only 20 percent of respondents support a possible new tax on employer-provided health care benefits, and a Washington Post/ABC News poll found 70 percent opposed it. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found 54 percent of respondents oppose the new tax.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that Obama opposes taxing health benefits, but stopped short of calling it a deal-breaker for the president.
Instead, she advocated Obama's proposal to cap tax exemptions for the wealthy -- those earning more than $250,000 a year -- to the levels under Republican President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s.
The proposal would raise an estimated $330 billion, Sebelius said, which would cover most of the health care reform costs not met by reduced spending on existing programs.
"The bottom line is, it's got to be paid for, and we all have a shared responsibility that we all need to play a role," Sebelius said.
On the same program, Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee took the opposite stance, rejecting higher income taxes for the wealthy but calling for a new tax on the benefits of the most expensive employer-provided health insurance plans.
He and other Republicans support a plan that would give Americans cash -- initial figures suggest $5,000-$7,000 a year -- to buy their own private health insurance instead of creating a government-funded public option favored by Obama.
"If we have a Cadillac insurance and your employer gives you, then some of it will be imposed," said Alexander, with the help of new revenue to "give everyone a chance to buy their own health care insurance. "
Republicans also argue that the limitation on income tax exemptions for wealthy Americans harm small business owners, many of which are in tax brackets rich as they claim their business income on tax returns personal.
A spokesman for Majority Leader Harry Reid in the Senate, which met with Republicans on July 8, said the Nevada Democrat believes it is time for the opposition senators to decide if the intention to participate in the drafting of a bill, or simply opposed to any real reform.
Republicans also argue that the limitation on income tax exemptions for wealthy Americans harm small business owners, many of which are in tax brackets rich as they claim their business income on tax returns personal.
A spokesman for Majority Leader Harry Reid in the Senate, which met with Republicans on July 8, said the Nevada Democrat believes it is time for the opposition senators to decide if the intention to participate in the drafting of a bill, or simply opposed to any real reform.
-
Tap Retirement Funds Penalty-Free Age Can Play A Role IRA
Copyright 2009 Investor's Business Daily, Inc.All Rights Reserved Investor's Business Daily June 1, 2009... -
Health Plans awaiting verdict in 2010 Medicare Advantage Cut
(BestWire Services Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) Health plans expect to hear a final decision on 6 April... -
Getting Older, but working longer: the average age at retire
Copyright: The News-Sentinel, Fort Wayne, Ind. Source: News-Sentinel, The (Fort Wayne, IN) Wordcount:... -
Obama signs of stimulation of the bill includes retroactive
Obama signs of stimulation of the bill includes retroactive pay Caps on TARP enterprises Raymond J Lehmann... -
High-Deductible Health Plans Often Enroll Low-Income Vulnera
Study finds that high-deductible health plans are increasingly used by healthy people who are unlikely... -
Class-Action Suit Says Nationwide Life Sold Unauthorized Fix
A proposed class-action lawsuit has been filed against Nationwide Life Insurance Co. alleging the company...
Today's Top Picks
- HOT
- Latest
- Last Post
- Rand
- Aetna CEO Ronald A. Williams' 2008 Pay Package:
- average monthly cost for health insurance
- House Democrats Say CBO Projects $500 Billion
- UnitedHealth, Aetna Win TRICARE contracts,
- Tap Retirement Funds Penalty-Free Age Can
- Health Plans awaiting verdict in 2010 Medicare
- President Obama to Hold Health Insurance
- Getting Older, but working longer: the average
- Up to $ 3,800 fine for failing to Get Health
- Obama signs of stimulation of the bill includes
- Seniors Defend Targeted Health Plan; Obama
- High-Deductible Health Plans Often Enroll
- Stimulus to Help with COBRA Costs
- Class-Action Suit Says Nationwide Life Sold
- More Workers Move 401(k) Savings To Stable-Value
- Milliman Survey Says Dominate Variable Annuity
- Aflac Named Top Brand in Insurance and Financial
- Medco CEO Compensation Worth $ 14.3 in 2008
- What is the Actual Number of Americans Without
- House Democrat's Health Care Reform Bill
-
Getting Older, but working longer: the average age at retire
Copyright: The News-Sentinel, Fort Wayne, Ind. Source: News-Sentinel, The (Fort Wayne, IN) Wordcount:... -
Up to $ 3,800 fine for failing to Get Health Insurance
WASHINGTON_A top senator is calling for fines of up to $3,800 on families who fail to get medical insurance... -
Obama signs of stimulation of the bill includes retroactive
Obama signs of stimulation of the bill includes retroactive pay Caps on TARP enterprises Raymond J Lehmann... -
Seniors Defend Targeted Health Plan; Obama Says Medicare Advantage Subsidy Is Wasteful Boon To Insurers
WASHINGTON -- One of the largest spending cuts Congress could rely on to pay for an overhaul of the nation's... -
High-Deductible Health Plans Often Enroll Low-Income Vulnera
Study finds that high-deductible health plans are increasingly used by healthy people who are unlikely... -
Stimulus to Help with COBRA Costs
Copyright 2009 Gannett Company, Inc.All Rights Reserved USA TODAY 3 March 2009 Tuesday FINAL Editio SECTION:...
Featured Stories
-
Tap Retirement Funds Penalty-Free Age Can Play A Role IRA
-
Health Plans awaiting verdict in 2010 Medicare Advantage Cut
-
Getting Older, but working longer: the average age at retire
-
High-Deductible Health Plans Often Enroll Low-Income Vulnera
-
Milliman Survey Says Dominate Variable Annuity products guar
-
Aetna’s CEO Williams Tops Industry List for “America’s
Insurance News Health Insurance Life Insurance Property Insurance Casualty Insurance Car Insurance Travel Insurance Reinsurance News Breaking News Law&Regulation insurance videos insurance jobs
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Rssmap
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy insurancenewsnet.org All rights reserved.