Can a Public Insurance Plan Increase Competition and Lower the Costs of Health Reform?
Monday, Oct 26,2009, 9:43:30 AM Click:
The basic idea behind this approach is to develop a government-funded plan that would follow the traditional Medicare program in many respects and would compete with private insurers for covered lives. It could be modeled after the traditional Medicare program, but that is not a necessity; other government selffunded plan models are possible. Using the Medicare example, the plan could use Medicare’s evolving systems of payment for hospitals, physicians, and other providers. The levels or rates of payment could be the same or perhaps somewhat higher than Medicare but lower than typical private payments today.
The public plan could also use Medicare policies to determine what types of services, including new procedures and technologies, would be covered, and it could take advantage of Medicare research on medical homes, chronic care coordination programs, and health information technology and adopt them when cost-effective. Benefits would differ from Medicare in that they would be structured more like typical employer-based insurance, including pharmaceuticals, out-of-pocket maximums, and common levels of cost sharing. The expectation is that the administrative costs of the public plan would be below those of the private competitors.
The intent of the competing public plan is to use the administrative efficiencies of government-run health insurance plans, as well as the purchasing power of government to control costs. The underlying argument is that individual insurers do not have (or are unwilling to use) the market power to counter the pricing power of many hospital systems or physician specialties. This seems likely to remain true even if reforms lead to more aggressive competition in insurance/managed care markets. Thus, the power of a larger purchaser motivated to contain costs is needed to control rising health care expenditures. The concerns over the use of a public plan are that its purchasing power will be overused4 and will lead to the elimination of the private market and to a government-run health care system.
The overuse of monopsony power, seen by some as inevitable because of budgeting constraints, could then lead to reduced access, lower quality, and the explicit rationing of health care due to constraints on supply and financing. There is also concern that government plans have unfair advantages over private plans: they don’t need to maintain reserves, earn profits to attract capital, or pay premium taxes. In this brief, we argue that using a public plan is a good idea and will likely contribute to cost containment but is probably not a panacea. It’s likely to have lower administrative costs and to exert more control over provider payment rates. But there are clear limits on the use of government power as a payer. As aresult, concerns that it will drive out strong private competitors are misplaced.
You may also be interested in:
- HIT THE RESTART BUTTON ON HEALTH CARE REFORM
- Legislator: 'Hurricane' of Federal Bills Challenge State-Based Regulation
- Obama Welcomes Progress On Health Care Overhaul
- China to improve small firms' access to finance
- BestWeek: NAIC Seeks Route Through Legal, Political Roadblocks for Reinsurance Framework
Copyright 2009 TheStreet.com, Inc.All Rights Reserved TheStreet.com 28 March
American International Group, Inc. (AIG) reported its first quarterly profit
Copyright 2009 Business Wire, Inc. Business Wire April 23, 2009 Thursday 4:09
Copyright: The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
Copyright: The Associated Press. All rights reserved. May This material may not
HAMILTON, Bermuda--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Assured Guaranty Ltd. (Assured)
NEW YORK, June 15 /PRNewswire/ -- A coalition of insurance companies today
- Most Read
- Most Discussed
- Most Emailed
- average monthly cost for health insurance
- Aetna CEO Ronald A. Williams' 2008 Pay Package: $3.14 Millio
- "Usual and Customary" Rates in the Health Insurance Industry
- House Democrats Say CBO Projects $500 Billion in Gross Savings From Medicare
- Getting Older, but working longer: the average age at retire
- UnitedHealth, Aetna Win TRICARE contracts, Replacement Humana, Health Net
- Tap Retirement Funds Penalty-Free Age Can Play A Role IRA
- Extension of TRICARE Health Insurance Coverage Included
- Health Plans awaiting verdict in 2010 Medicare Advantage Cut
- 10-Step HIPAA Compliance Program
- CIGNA & CMC Life Enters China's Health Insurance Market
- Fannie, Freddie Overseer Defends Big Bonus
- Health System Feud Now A Federal Case
- Questions And Answers On Health Care Plan
- Snowe Talks To Business Owners On Health Care
- Indian Insurers Asked To Explore Daycare Hospital Treatment
- Commentary: Health care outrage goes uncovered
- White House Appears Ready to Drop 'Public Option'