Beneficiary Designated By Annuity Owner Is Entitled To Annui
Monday, Mar 09,2009, 12:03:05 AM Click:
February 28, 2009
Pg. 4
624 words
Beneficiary designated by annuity owner is entitled to annuity payments; Royal Indem. Co. v. Bates, No. 08-40144 (5th Jan. 16, 2009)
The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the person the decedent designated as the beneficiary for annuity payments. Only the annuity owner could designate the beneficiary for the annuity payments.
Royal Indemnity Co. and First Colony Life Insurance Co. brought an interpleader action. The disputed property was proceeds from an annuity that Royal owned with First Colony. Royal owned the annuity, through a settlement agreement, because it was an insurer: Royal's insured, General Motors Corp., instructed Royal to purchase the annuity to finance a settlement agreement between General Motors, another company, and James Koonce and his then-wife Zanna Russell. As the annuity's owner, Royal possessed the exclusive right to change the annuity's payees.
Subsequently, Koonce sent a signed, notarized letter to the insurance broker servicing the annuity contract, Casualty Services Inc. (CSI), in which he purported to designate Kathy Bates as his survivor-beneficiary. CSI forwarded the letter to Royal. Royal did not, however, instruct First Colony to designate Bates as Koonce's survivor-beneficiary. Koonce was not advised by Royal or First Colony that Royal had not designated Bates as his survivor-beneficiary.
When Koonce died, Royal and First Colony found a copy of Koonce's letter purporting to designate Bates as his beneficiary. Uncertain whether Koonce's purported designation was effective, Royal and First Colony suspended payment of the annuity and initiated the interpleader action to determine who, among Bates, Russell and Koonce's heirs (James Koonce; Stephanie Koonce Mendez; Sandy Alvarado; Tammy Steinburg; Tina Robertson; and Doris Meyer, individually and as guardian of minors Christina Koonce, Christopher Koonce and Alexander Koonce) was entitled to the annuity payments.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Bates, granted costs and attorneys' fees to Royal and First Colony, and denied leave to Koonce's heirs to file a counter-complaint against Royal and First Colony for breach of contract. Koonce's heirs appealed. Only annuity owner can designate beneficiary.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded the case. There was no properly designated beneficiary at the time of Koonce's death since only Royal, as the annuity owner, could designate Bates as Koonce's beneficiary. Because Bates had never been designated as Koonce's beneficiary under the annuity, Bates was not Koonce's beneficiary. Koonce's heirs were entitled to the funds.
The Fifth Circuit also found that because Royal and First Colony's actions were in part responsible for much of the uncertainty surrounding whether Bates was Koonce's beneficiary, rewarding their endeavors with costs and attorneys' fees was an abuse of discretion. However, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Koonce heirs' motion for leave to file the counter-complaint against Royal and First Colony since the counter-complaint was not timely filed.
Counsel for Royal : Timothy J. O'Driscoll, Drinker Biddle & Reath, 215-988-2700, Philadelphia; Robert W. Weber, Smith Weber L.L.P., 903-223-5656, Texarkana, Tex.; Lisa D. Stern, Drinker Biddle & Reath, 610-993-2200, Berwyn, Pa.
Counsel for Koonce's heirs : David J. Potter, David J. Potter & Assocs., 903-794-2283, Texarkana, Tex.
Counsel for Bates : William W. Miller, Greer McCasland & Miller, 903-791-9300, Texarkana, Tex.
Source: Texas Insurance Law and Litigation Alert, 02/28/2009
Copyright © 2009 by Strafford Publications, Inc. http://www.straffordpub.com/ All rights reserved. Storage, reproduction or transmission by any means is prohibited except pursuant to a valid license agreement.
March 3, 2009
Copyright © 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
You may also be interested in:
Featured
Prudential Financial to take failed Yamato Life in
Iris Lai TOKYO, March 24, 2009 (AM Best via COMTEX) -- Gibraltar Life Insurance
Obama presses doctors to back health care overhaul
CHICAGO_President Barack Obama bluntly told doctors Monday he is against their
In a Quiet Storm Season, State Debates Insurance
TALLAHASSEE - Florida moved a little closer to reducing its financial
Bank of America began to reduce the principal amount
Bank of America Corp., one of the largest mortgage lenders in Florida, said
Insurers Need Clear Attitude from CIRC
Insurers in China, which always show interest in IPO shares, did not subscribe
Colo. Department of regulators Insurance Agent 'Strips
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies has revoked Colorado Springs
MOST POPULAR
- Most Read
- Most Discussed
- Most Emailed
- Insurance Industry Campaign Contributions Lean in Favor of Democrats
- Total Admitted Assets for Top 25 U.S. Life/Health Writers Dr
- Class Action Suit against Nationwide Insurance
- MetLife's Bank Passes Federal Government's Stress Tests
- Indexed Annuity Sales Set A Record For 2Q 2009
- Insurance Department Releases Report on Executive Compensation at State's Largest Blues' Plans
- New York Life’s Top Ratings Affirmed by All Four Major Rating Agencies
- Best Removes From Under Review, Affirms Ratings of Liberty Bankers Life Insurance Company and Subsidiary; Outlook Negative
- Bank BOLI Assets Exceed $126 Billion in 2008
- LIMRA/McKinsey Study Reveals How Life Insurers Can Optimize
-
Lincoln Financial Group To Pay $ 500 million debt due April -
NJ Considers Raising pension guarantee to $ 250,000 -
Job Shift insurers on premiums -
Beyond the gold or silver: The Long Term Care Insurance flig -
Bank BOLI Assets Exceed $126 Billion in 2008 -
IRS Rules on Tax Treatments of Life Settlements -
U.S. Insurance Industry Issue Alert on health care -
See consumers life insurance as a way to help offset the value of lost assets because of financial volatility


Discuss this news
Click Here to see all comments