Submitted by 03/07/09 , Click: , Source: insurance news net
Copyright 2009 Crain CommunicationsAll Rights Reserved Business Insurance
February 9, 2009
NEWS; Pg. 4
326 words
Former RenaissanceRe chief Stanard fined $100K over Inter-Ocean deal
JUDY GREENWALD
NEW YORK-A judge has imposed a $100,000 civil fine on former RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer James N. Stanard for his role in orchestrating a two-part sham reinsurance deal with another reinsurer in 2001, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
In 2006, Mr. Stanard and two other former RenaissanceRe officials-former Controller Martin Merritt and former Senior Vp Michael Cash-were charged by the SEC with orchestrating the deal with Inter-Ocean Reinsurance Co. Ltd., a finite-risk reinsurer now in runoff. Messrs. Merritt and Cash, as well as the company itself, earlier settled with the SEC.
The SEC charged that the effect of that transaction was to smooth and defer $26.2 million of Pembroke, Bermuda-based RenaissanceRe's income from 2001 to 2002 and 2003.
In his bench-trial ruling in favor of the SEC, Judge Gerald E. Lynch said: ``Even if Stanard did not decide, in so many words, `I want to do something fraudulent,' the SEC has demonstrated that Stanard was, at the least, highly reckless with respect to the Inter-Ocean transaction.'' The SEC showed ``by a substantial preponderance of the evidence,'' that Mr. Stanard wanted to engage in a transaction that was ``without economic reality,'' Judge Lynch ruled.
The court, in finding that Mr. Stanard violated federal securities laws, issued the fine and permanently enjoined him from violating or aiding or abetting violations of their provisions. But the court denied the SEC's request that Mr. Stanard, who resigned from RenaissanceRe in 2005, be barred from serving as an officer or director of a publicly held company, stating the SEC has not shown that he ``obtained any ill-gotten gains or unjust enrichment as a result of the fraudulent accounting.''
Asked about the possibility of an appeal, Mr. Stanard's attorney, James D. Mathias of DLA Piper US L.L.P. in Baltimore, said, ``At this point, we're still considering all our alternatives.''
February 13, 2009
Copyright © 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
February 9, 2009
NEWS; Pg. 4
326 words
Former RenaissanceRe chief Stanard fined $100K over Inter-Ocean deal
JUDY GREENWALD
NEW YORK-A judge has imposed a $100,000 civil fine on former RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer James N. Stanard for his role in orchestrating a two-part sham reinsurance deal with another reinsurer in 2001, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
In 2006, Mr. Stanard and two other former RenaissanceRe officials-former Controller Martin Merritt and former Senior Vp Michael Cash-were charged by the SEC with orchestrating the deal with Inter-Ocean Reinsurance Co. Ltd., a finite-risk reinsurer now in runoff. Messrs. Merritt and Cash, as well as the company itself, earlier settled with the SEC.
The SEC charged that the effect of that transaction was to smooth and defer $26.2 million of Pembroke, Bermuda-based RenaissanceRe's income from 2001 to 2002 and 2003.
In his bench-trial ruling in favor of the SEC, Judge Gerald E. Lynch said: ``Even if Stanard did not decide, in so many words, `I want to do something fraudulent,' the SEC has demonstrated that Stanard was, at the least, highly reckless with respect to the Inter-Ocean transaction.'' The SEC showed ``by a substantial preponderance of the evidence,'' that Mr. Stanard wanted to engage in a transaction that was ``without economic reality,'' Judge Lynch ruled.
The court, in finding that Mr. Stanard violated federal securities laws, issued the fine and permanently enjoined him from violating or aiding or abetting violations of their provisions. But the court denied the SEC's request that Mr. Stanard, who resigned from RenaissanceRe in 2005, be barred from serving as an officer or director of a publicly held company, stating the SEC has not shown that he ``obtained any ill-gotten gains or unjust enrichment as a result of the fraudulent accounting.''
Asked about the possibility of an appeal, Mr. Stanard's attorney, James D. Mathias of DLA Piper US L.L.P. in Baltimore, said, ``At this point, we're still considering all our alternatives.''
February 13, 2009
Copyright © 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
-
USAA Files Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Web Site
USAA Files Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Web Site Chad Hemenway United Services Automobile Association... -
AIG's Asian Operations Restructure, May Go Public
Copyright 2009 A.M. Best Company, Inc.All Rights Reserved BestWire March 5, 2009 Thursday 10:31 AM EST... -
British Government Takes Controlling Stake In Lloyds Banking
British government takes controlling stake in Lloyds Banking Group JENNIFER QUINN LONDON _ The British... -
Rethink Enterprise Risk Model in Recession
Copyright 2009 A.M. Best Company, Inc.All Rights Reserved BestWire March 5, 2009 Thursday 03:28 PM EST... -
Reports Name AIG's Derivative Counterparties
Reports name AIG's derivative counterparties, including BMO NEW YORK _ The U.S. government bailout of... -
Congress requires that hospitals Justify Tax-Exempt Status
Congress seeks to justify exempt hospitals: What, other measures should help to identify free, reduced...
Today's Top Picks
- HOT
- Latest
- Last Post
- Rand
- Preliminary observations on Humana Medicare
- USAA Files Trademark Infringement Lawsuit
- Slain Greenwich Developer's Widow Will not
- AIG's Asian Operations Restructure, May
- HIPAA Violations Are Finally Starting To
- British Government Takes Controlling Stake
- Former Medical Director Speaks Out About
- Head of Hawaii Captive Regulation Joins
- Rethink Enterprise Risk Model in Recession
- Reports Name AIG's Derivative Counterparties
- Suncorp profits hit by extreme weather and
- Congress requires that hospitals Justify
- Knotts denies interference in DHEC: Exex-agent
- Should You Be Concerned About Municipal
- Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Has Two
- Employers failure to pay support for nosocomial
- Lawyers' Attack Ads Doom Bills
- Nebraska Legislature: Bill seeks more data
- Federal Circuit Court Holds That ERISA Does
- Satellite Collision coverage May Set Precedent
-
Head of Hawaii Captive Regulation Joins DTRIC Insurance Co.
Head of Hawaii Captive Regulation Joins DTRIC Insurance Co. Meg Green Craig M. Watanabe, deputy Hawaii... -
Rethink Enterprise Risk Model in Recession
Copyright 2009 A.M. Best Company, Inc.All Rights Reserved BestWire March 5, 2009 Thursday 03:28 PM EST... -
Reports Name AIG's Derivative Counterparties
Reports name AIG's derivative counterparties, including BMO NEW YORK _ The U.S. government bailout of... -
Suncorp profits hit by extreme weather and claims Bad Bank
Suncorp profits hit by extreme weather and claims bank Bad Debt Iris Lai Suncorp Metway Ltd [87,834] reported... -
Congress requires that hospitals Justify Tax-Exempt Status
Congress seeks to justify exempt hospitals: What, other measures should help to identify free, reduced... -
Knotts denies interference in DHEC: Exex-agent claims to hav
Knotts denies interference in DHEC: Ex-agent says he was assigned after politicians complained of dumping...
Featured Stories
Insurance News Health Insurance Life Insurance Property Insurance Casualty Insurance Car Insurance Travel Insurance Reinsurance News Breaking News Law&Regulation insurance videos insurance jobs
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Rssmap
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy insurancenewsnet.org All rights reserved.

